Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-37 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: jeffy@lewhoosh.umd.edu (Jeffrey C. Burka)
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 1991 14:28:16 -0700
Subject: instruments
To: love-hounds@wiretap.spies.com
In-Reply-To: <7B6EC7AB6000009B@sc.intel.com>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Computer Science Center, University of Maryland, College Park
Andy writes in the synth discussion: >One flutist went farther, though. The flutist played the music, then went >back and edited out all of the breaths between notes--forming one >"superbreath" for the duration of the music. Now, this is a real instrument, >but an unreal performance. Which is better? Flute playing with breaths, or >flute playing without taking a breath? Anybody who's a fan of the Ian Anderson school of flautism (and I know there are a number of Tull fans around .gaffa) should have a rather easy answer to this one.... ;-) Jeff -- |Jeffrey C. Burka | "At night they're seen | | | Laughing, loving, | |jeffy@lewhoosh.umd.edu | They know the way to be happy" --KaTe |