No Subject

[root@crash.cts.com]

Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Path: pnet01!rhill
From: rhill@pnet01.cts.com (Ronald Hill)
Subject: Re: O levels????
Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 1991 10:36:11 GMT
Message-ID: <1991Jun16.103611.14251@crash.cts.com>
Sender: root@crash.cts.com

martinn@csri.toronto.EDU (Tippi Chai) writes:
>graham@ug.cs.dal.ca (Michael Graham) writes:
>>So Kate had 10 (O) levels...hmm
>>Can you get your O level by getting a 50% on the exam?
>
>*NO* *WAY*.  The British system considers anything below grade C
>a failure, so you need at least 60%.
>
>Ahem, now that I got you attention, let me have my say regarding
>the H@pp& issue.  THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I'VE EVER USED A KILL FILE
>IN .GAFFA.  The original postings I just skipped over, but when
>postings about postings about H%pp# started to race across my screen,
>I pressed that shift-K.  (Now I hope I'm not going to start a flood of
>postings about postings about postings about H=pp! ;-)
>--
>"Conquer the Universe! Unimaginable Power! Unlimited Rice Pudding!" The Doctor
>
>Tippi Chai
>GUEST ON : {decvax,ihnp4,allegra}!utcsri!martinn  ||  martinn@csri.toronto.edu
>Disclaimer: all opinions, pinions and onions expressed herein are solely mine.

But why would te have so many more than needed?  Is this as unusual as they
say?

UUCP: {hplabs!hp-sdd ucsd nosc}!crash!pnet01!rhill
ARPA: crash!pnet01!rhill@nosc.mil
INET: rhill@pnet01.cts.com