Re: Ebb and Flow and Confluence---reply to Jenn Turney

[Jon Drukman <jondr@sco.COM>]

No one yet knows why stern@CHEM.NWU.EDU (Charlotte Stern) said:
>Richard's point recently that there is a "musical correctness" at play
>in gaffa almost misses the point.

Think about it some more, I think he hit an uncomfortably sharp nail
squarely on the head.

>If Happy Rhodes is mentioned for 6 months straight by every other
>posting, some common bond between Kate and Happy must surely exist.

Sorry Mike.  I was with you up to this point, but this is a horrible error
in logic.  We discussed the "is |>oug's chair red" thread to the tune of
ten messages a day for a long time and that had only the most tenuous of
bonds to KaTe.  In fact, it really was part of one of those tedious
objective/subjective art debates.  You said it yourself - this is a
freeform discussion group, and topics of tangential relevance to KaTe come
and go with alacrity.  

I'm so excited, another Jenn&Jon collaboration is going down tonight.  Keep
your ears peeled kiddoes, this one should be a knockout.

-- 
Jon Drukman (edited for television)          uunet!sco!jondr      jondr@sco.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Always note the sequencer - this will never let us down.