Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-10 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Peter Byrne Manchester <PMANCHESTER@ccmail.sunysb.edu>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 1991 00:18 EST
Subject: Re: Deify Kate Bush?
>I just don't get it ... writes Dave Neff in a post entitled "Why Deify Kate?" >In this newsgroup it seems that Kate is more than a mortal, she is a >venerated deity. People testify of "how they found Kate" as if she >were some sort of religious conversion. First part wrong (or at least I so recommend); second part, pretty close! Since mine was among the testimonials he perhaps is reacting to--and I do after all call her "God's sister"!--perhaps I might try a little clarification. Not to mix business with pleasure, it happens that theology is the field I work, teach, and write in. There IS a tradition in this group in which from time to time someone seized by admiring enthusiasm will state outright, "Kate Bush is God!" More common is an oblique invocation of this flagrant piece of heresy, the phrase "She really is...", shared as a kind of "insider's" secret. I suspect that nearly all of the time, if the proposition were stared down in the cold light of day, its subscribers would admit that it is hyperbole. If I had to comment on the whole phenomenon at a professional conference (I promise not to!), I would probably surmise that a lot of the time, the hidden message is "there is no God" (or at least an "In your face!" to now-scorned modes of piety). There would be a whole riff one could do, that the theological establishment would eat right up, about how this is evidence that 'loss of faith' leaves this generation with a spiritual hole that needs filling, blah blah blah. That kind of party line would be completely wrong, in my view, because my take on the many of us in this group (and the many others I know outside it) whose devotion to Kate gravitates toward such sentiments is that we have NEVER lost capacity for faith--just any hope for a worthy object of it. There is a lot to be said in defense of Dave's summation that discovering Kate was like a religious conversion for us: it wasn't just coming to like HER, it was discovering that the world and life itself were better than we had been assuming. Lots of individual variation there, of course: one discovers in oneself an unexpected capacity to be deeply moved by art; or one discovers that the water CAN rise again in the long-dry well of old and lost enthusiasm; or a particular lyric, or tune, or emotion can seem to have been sung or directed uniquely and privately for oneself, evoking a sense of wonder at the intimacy of human communication. >Is there something about Kate being a woman (and an attractive one at >that) which adds to this tendancy of some (generally men may I add) who >venerate her person and material? I just don't get it ... Thing is, I know several women personally whose sense of discovery with Kate is little different from my own. I especially remember one saying, about a song on "Never for Ever," that when she heard it she was SURE that it had been written and sung for her alone. New love-hound Judi is as effusive as any of us, and is far from alone. If there is something in her being female that is relevant (I expect there is), it is certainly not at the level of simple attractiveness--Kate doesn't work that way. Being female--a daughter, a sister, a woman--is a resource for her in her search for concrete human experience to draw from, but not the only one: she has not only regularly sought to take a male point of view, but even explored the reciprocity that makes this possible ("Running up that Hill"). Physical attractiveness is among tools for her work in dance and mime. It's always the work we are responding to. For all these reasons, I myself maintain that KB is God's sister--by which I do NOT mean to deify her, since it is precisely in her humanity that I have learned something from her about the divine. I tried to bring this out in the last line of my letter to her, "Your aspiration is a kind of prayer." I don't know whether there is a God, or what 'is' is supposed to mean in such statements, but I do know something about what prayer would be if I were capable of it, and I very much admire anyone who helps me think I might be. "We humans got it all, we perform the miracles." ("Them Heavy People"). This is straight out of every authentic spiritual tradition--Meister Eckhart comes to mind for a start. IMHO, I don't think any of us are deifying Kate Bush. But I think we HAVE felt some shadow of whatever 'the divine' might be in the intimacy and communion and reciprocity we have come to feel with her, as performer and audience, once we learned to hear her and trust her. ............................................................................ Peter Manchester "C'mon, we all sing!" pmanches@sbccmail (BITNET) pmanchester@ccmail.sunysb.edu (INTERNET)