Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1989-21 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: usenet@ames.arc.nasa.gov
Date: Fri, 6 Oct 89 14:10:36 PDT
Path: lll-winken!das!ed From: ed@das.llnl.gov (Edward Suranyi) Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa Subject: Re: Is Kate Bush the only thing discussed here? Date: 6 Oct 89 21:10:36 GMT References: <1989Oct5.212210.20294@i-core.UUCP> <3941@blake.acs.washington.edu> Sender: usenet@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV Reply-To: ed@das.UUCP (Edward Suranyi) Organization: Dept. of Applied Science, UC Davis at LLNL Lines: 23 >Really-From: donley@blake.acs.washington.edu (Erik Olson) >I would personally like to hear from sone of the Jane Siberry fans , >but they apparently need to stay in the closet lest they be trampled on by the >rabid "Kate Bush is God. All the rest suck" crowd. > - Erik Donley Olson I don't think anyone who has read this newsgroup regularly over the last few months can possibly have any doubts about how I feel about Kate Bush. But I'm also a big fan of Jane Siberry's. I have almost all of her albums. She was interviewed about nine months ago on _Totally Wired_, a public radio show, and I taped it. The point is that Kate Bush IS God, but all the rest don't necessarily suck. Ed (Edward Suranyi) Dept. of Applied Science, UC Davis/Livermore ed@das.llnl.gov Until further notice, I CANNOT reply to mail by UUNET. So don't ask me to.