Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1989-16 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: jsd@gaffa.mit.edu (Jon Drukman)
Date: 20 Aug 89 01:25:17 GMT
Subject: Re: random notes; for Drukman / Tamar / IED
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: The Flip Side Of Now
References: <8908191922.AA13222@laurent.mit.edu>
Reply-To: jsd@gaffa.UUCP (Jon Drukman)
Sender: uucp@eddie.MIT.EDU
>Really-From: jw@math.mit.edu > > >Well, I read a "Rolling Stone" article on Gabriel last summer, and in >response to a question about drugs in the sixties he said "the only >drug I was ever interested in was acid, and I was too scared of my >ordinary dreams to try that." I always thought this was the thinking >person's attitude, so I had a lot of respect for this. Hah! What about empirical evidence? Ever hear of that? "Thinking persons" attitude? I scoff! It's almost as bad as my (clearly deranged) sister refusing to listen to any other Kate songs than "Wuthering Heights" just cos she thinks they won't be as good... >A (creative) person could certainly write about a "drug" experience >that was not chemically induced. Though why would one want to? Well, I would assume that if it were a chemical experience worth writing about, then writing about it at the time would be extremely difficult. At least, I would hope so! >In "Houdini" I believe Kate writes "...using code only you and I know..." >so she must be able to write using proper grammar. My own theory >with regard to "You and me knew life itself..." is that it fits the >meter a little better, and is consonant. I looked up "consonant" in my unabridged dictionary (yes, this is a real happening saturday night 'round the Drukman residence) and, while I readily admit that the sentence does indeed fit the definition, I am at a loss as to the significance. In other words: big deal! Are you being sarcastic? (I haven't been exposed to any sarcasm in a while so I don't recognize it easily any more... Henceforth include an X-Sarcasm header line, OK?) >For Drukman: >> the one who repeatedly spells my last name "Druckman" which is ALMOSt as >> bad as you spelling it "JOHN." > >An astonishing spelling error indeed! >(Besides, you should write "..your spelling..") > >(I'm only being mean to you because I liked Zardoz.) Bah, I was using a colloquial mode of speech. Presumably you didn't get it because I didn't put it in the "X-Pretension-Factor" header line. (I'm only being mean to you because Zardoz was a complete crock.) +---------------------- Is there any ESCAPE from NOISE? --------------------+ | | |\ | jsd@gaffa.mit.edu | "I think quotes are very dangerous | | \|on |/rukman | jsd@umass.bitnet | things." -- Kate Bush | +---------------------------------------------------------------------------+