Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1989-11 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: mcvax!eutrc3.urc.tue.nl!rcbamw@uunet.UU.NET (m.waucomont)
Date: 26 Jun 89 13:11:45 GMT
Subject: Re: Mailbag for Friday, June 16
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands
References: <753@eutrc3.urc.tue.nl> <8906232004.AA14941@hop.toad.com>
In article <8906232004.AA14941@hop.toad.com> tim@toad.COM (Tim Maroney) writes: >Quoted from: mcvax!eutrc3.urc.tue.nl!rcbamw@uunet.UU.NET (m.waucomont) >>Sleep? Sleeping = dreaming, DREams Are Meant To Illuminate ME. > >No, sleeping != dreaming. In fact, you spend a distinct minority of >your sleep time dreaming. > I know.. I was just hinting at DRE-A-M-T-I-ME ;-))) >>>Tim Maroney, Mac Software Consultant, sun!hoptoad!tim, tim@toad.com >> ^^^ >>Have you got only - I mean without one exeption! - purchased copies of >>the Finder? > >You don't purchase copies of the Finder. Upgrades are free. What I meant to say is, that if you read the Copyright Law carefully, you will notice that you are allowed to only have *ONE* disk with the software, wich may be loaded into the computers memory for execution. This is the only form of duplication allowed. But all Macintosh users I know have *multiple* copies of the Finder. That is illegal. Indeed the Mac comes with the Finder and indeed upgrades are free, but you _are supposed to_ boot from the original floppy. No copies allowed... says the law. So, if you stick to the letter of the law, all Macintosh users violate the Copyright Law and should be prosecuted. The point I am trying to make is that I feel laws are meant to protect the creator of a product as well as the consumer. Imagine what would happen if you would actually have to *buy* every *copy* of the Finder you are using.... The 'law behind the circeled c' (and the Finder definitely IS copyrighted, just check the about box!) says you are supposed to do so... but it is a tacit agreement between Apple and its users that they won't be prosecuted for dragging the System and Finder icon happily all over their disks. What I am propagating is that the law should be interpreted a little less vigorous as it has been in this newsgroup lately. I am definitely not advocating anarchy, but a bit more humane behaviour would be most welcome. Michel 'Mikki' Waucomont