Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1989-10 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: beyer@frith.egr.msu.edu (Don W Beyer)
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 89 11:47:03 EDT
Subject: RefleKTion...
Keywords: Copyright mess
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Engineering, Michigan State University, E. Lansing
References: <8YbQwOy00Vs88K=m5z@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: lemense@frith.UUCP (Thomas LeMense)
Sender: Thomas.LeMense@frith.egr.msu.edu
I too am not sure about the legal implications of the tapes discussed in this group for the last week or so, but I tend to look at it this way: Since you are reading this post, you read this group, and more than likely are a Kate devotee. Well, if you are anything like myself or the Kate Bush fans that I know, you already have bought all the legit material she has made on both album and CD, as well as having books, fanzines, etc. The purchase of a demos tape with dubious, if not non-existent copyright protection, for the mere price of materials and distribution...well, it tends to fall into the noise floor. Suppose I walked into EMI and asked for fifty promotional copies of this material, had it been released. EMI would have laughed and given me fifty, and fifty more for the road... Had IED asked for $10 a crack (still cheap, by bootleg standards) and planned to make a couple thousand of these things, well, that would strike me differently... As I said, this is merely the way I look at it, but I think that if maybe a lot more things in this world were held in this same perspective, we would spend less time taking each other to court and spend more time in a more constructive fashion!