Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1988-10 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IED0DXM%OAC.UCLA.EDU@MITVMA.MIT.EDU
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 88 10:58 PST
Subject: the choKolaTe war; _Ne_T'enfuis_pas; _HG_33_
To: Love-Hounds From: Andrew Marvick Subject: the choKolaTe war; _Ne_T'enfuis_pas; _HG_33_ IED saw _The_Chocolate_War_ yesterday, and thought he should post a word or two. First, it's a really good movie. There're no funny parts--it's all pretty much downbeat from beginning to end--but it's fascinating, like seeing a car accident. IED won't say anything about the storyline for fear of giving anything away. He will say that to him, more than just the inclusion of PGIV songs connects this film with _Birdy_. The only major difference in tone is that _Birdy_ had at least some humor in it. Otherwise, they handle similar themes and with a similar viewpoint and style. And they both unravel their stories in a way that rivets attention. As for Kate's participation: the song used is _Running_Up_That_Hill_ as Doug Weiman already reported in Love-Hounds yesterday. It isn't heard until the very last shot in the film, and it continues through the end credits. As with several of the other songs used in the movie, the original subject of Kate's song is twisted cleverly and effectively, so that its lyrics take on a new but completely compatible meaning within the context of the film. Very clever and stimulating, not to say moving for Kate fans. Incidentally, the total budget of the film was a ridiculously low $700,000. It looks like $7 Mil. It's interesting that of the four or five different artists whose songs were used (besides Kate and Gabriel, a song by Joan Armatrading and two by Alison Moyet's old Yazoo were dominant), only Gabriel apparently placed "conditions" on the use of his music. In the end credits, after all the artists and their songs are listed, a separate large-print notice appears: "In support of human rights and Amnesty International, Peter Gabriel has agreed to allow the use of his music in the making of this film," or something to that effect. Naturally, in the three reviews IED has read of the movie, Gabriel and Amnesty International have received special mention. Even though IED's family have supported AI for many years, he personally found that mention rather self-serving and manipulative. Why attach such conditions as a prerequisite for the use of one's music? The film should be able to make its own statement. Clearly the other artists-- Kate included--felt no need to attach their own agenda to the movie. IED read with great interest Doug Weiman's persuasive article about _Ne_T'enfuis_pas_. IED actually used to feel pretty much the same way Doug does now. He was convinced that that recording was one of the most perfect and complex pieces of music ever made --certainly in pop-music history. When, after the eighty-millionth listening (and already into his third or fourth copy of the single), he _then_ discovered the vocal (Fairlight) melody in the _introduction_ --before the main vocal begins, and so low in the mix that it had slipped by his attention for weeks--with its attendant harmony in fifths, he became convinced of the essential accuracy of his judgement. Musically, _Ne_T'enfuis_pas_ is an absolute jewel. As for the lyrics, IED sees the truth in what Doug says about them. Kate composed the song initially in French, using what little she felt confident of on her own, and then going to French friends for help in bringing the rest of the "story" into idiomatic French. The result is--IED is happy to say--excellent, from a linguistic point of view. As to the multivalence of the lyrics' meaning, IED does not disagree with Doug. Kate has never discussed the process of recording this track, as far as IED is aware. We know that she usually spends only a few days on b-sides--in several cases we know she actually recorded the b-side in one or two takes. But she has never talked about the specific recording of _Ne_T'enfuis_pas_ or _Lord_of_the_Reedy_River_ (which IED believes is just as important in terms of sound and arrangement). It seems impossible that she could have done these recordings in only a day or two, but who knows? As to whether _Ne_T'enfuis_pas_ is _the_ greatest song, however, well...Let's just say that since _The_Ninth_Wave_ was released, IED has found it difficult to attach number values to specific recordings. But it's definitely up there. -- Andrew Marvick P.S.: Thanks to Neil for his report on _Homeground_ No. 33. IED was gratified to hear that his review of the Juby book made it into the issue, though he would gladly have traded his moment of fame for some harder information about the progress of KBVI! IED is convinced that _HG_ know much, much more than they let on, and it bugs him.