Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1988-06 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "Liz Owens, Microcomputer Product Center, 491-3889"<BABOOSHKA@NUACC.ACNS.NWU.EDU>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 88 12:23 CDT
Subject: Wilhelm Reich info
Posted-Date: Wed, 27 Jul 88 12:23 CDT
Definitely look for _A_Book_of_Dreams_ if you can--it has to be one of the most bizzare true stories I've ever read. It's not often that one combines masturbation, psychology, radiation, rainmaking, the FDA, and UFOs in the same work and still gets a readable story. It's fascinating, though. For those interested in Reich and his works--well, most of his stuff is out of print or difficult to find. I did get this great $6.95 (or so) paperback at a Barnes and Noble-run bookstore here at Northwestern called _Reich_for_ Beginners_. It's a cartoon book, and makes his life and theories understandable even to the non-psychologist. The drawings are kind of fun, too. Just out of curiosity--did *my* interpretation of "Suspended in Gaffa" reach anyone? My theories don't coincide with anyone's I've seen. Lizooshka [ |>oug has dug up the following article that Lizooshka refers to: -- |>oug ] Date: Tue, 24 May 88 09:52 CDT From: "I give in to sin because I like to practice what I preach...." <BABOOSHKA@nuacc.acns.nwu.edu> Subject: May I be so humble... ...as to offer an interpretation of "Suspended in Gaffa" that no one has yet presented during my brief time on the mailing list? Yes, I admit it's rather superficial, and you will all strip the flesh from my bones for it, but I feel compelled to say my piece. "Out in the garden" sets the scene, a couple in a garden. Simple, eh? Gets worse.... "Half of a heaven" means that the couple in question cannot commit, as one of them is married. "we're only bluffing, we're not ones for busting through walls" is the discression of their meetings. They've been very careful, so careful that they need to prove their infidelities in order to get the divorce ("unless we can prove that we're doing it we can't have it all,"). I believe that at one time in England the only way to get a divorce was to have to prove in court that your spouse had been unfaithful by producing the actual lover in court, or, at the very least, some witnesses ("who'll talk when he's called) to the infidelities. The rest of the song is less clear, but it seems to be focussed on the fears of this woman. She loves him, but there will be scandal. Is she doing the right thing, being the party of this man's divorce ("he's gonna wangle a way to get out of it")? She isn't even involved at this point, as they have another woman willing to be held as the actual lover ("she's an excuse") in court. But in the meantime, they are going to have to be separated until the whole thing is over, to keep her name out of the mud, and she is having her doubts about the whole thing. She vacillates between wanting it all and bouts of tears and self-exploration. She's in this thing way over her head, and hates herself for doubting the relationship and her reasons behind it. (Forgive me for not backing all this up with quotes-- I'm at work and don't have my copy of "The Dreaming" just sitting next to me.) Ok, crucify me now. But I feel, somehow, this works on at least one level of Kate interpretation. And, if any of you agree with me on this one, I think it shows that there is never one single way of interpreting a song (unless it's by Tiffany!). Kate's lyrics are too much like poetry to ever be subject to a single set of rules. Lizooshka