Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1987-12 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: decvax!marko@decwrl.DEC.COM (D. Mark Ouellette)
Date: 22 May 87 15:45:02 GMT
Subject: Submission for rec-music-gaffa
Responding-System: elrond.CalComp.COM
Path: elrond!marko From: marko@elrond.CalComp.COM (D. Mark Ouellette) Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa Subject: Re: ...an insKripTion inside -- straight from his heart to mine, I hope! Summary: More on Kate, Maiden, etc.... Date: 22 May 87 15:44:59 GMT References: <8705202317.AA23028@EDDIE.MIT.EDU> Organization: Calcomp, A Lockheed Company, Hudson, NH, USA Lines: 79 In article <8705202317.AA23028@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>, Love-Hounds-request@EDDIE.MIT.EDU writes: > Really-From: IED0DXM%UCLAMVS.BITNET@wiscvm.wisc.edu > > Thanks very much for the kind notice, Cameron. > > To Mark Ouellette: > No great disrespect was intended by IED's remarks re Iron Maiden, Mark. No offense taken. > It's great to hear that the band admire Kate's music. > In this listener's opinion, however, it's unfortunate > that that admiration seems nowhere to be reflected in their own music, I too cannot detect any of Kate's influence in Maiden's tunes but then they are Iron Maiden and Kate is Kate. Each has thier own brand of music. I listen to Maiden for what THEIR music is and I listen to Kate for HER music. I like some variety! Admittedly, I am most partial to Heavy Metal music but I still like/listen/appreciate other types of music too. > which instead conforms all too often to an extremely tired genre. Based on personal preference, I'd be inclined to disagree with that but we all have our own opinions and I'd have to say we are all entitiled to them. But who's to say which is right? > IED never meant to say that all of Heavy Metal was exclusively > devoted to a single subject; only that there was a definite obsession > among these bands with costume-shop mediaevalism and anachronistic > notions of masculine heroism. You've got a VERY valid point here. But then consider this, the music is for the most part of the loud and agressive nature, right? Those subjects do tend to lend themselves quite well to the music. > Even you admitted that Iron Maiden often use exactly > the kind of subjects which IED has associated them with. > Your comments about the group do not reduce the > likelihood that their use of 'KT' is a reference to Arthurian chivalry, > magic, loud blood-and-guts bravery, etc. And just for the > record, it's KT, not TK. I stand corrected on the KT. I wasn't too sure about it but it looked like the T came before the K in the picture. Yes, you may be right about the symbol and Maiden's use of it but then I still wouldn't write it off as a reference to Kate... Check the cover of "Somewhere In Time" out sometime. It has alot of references to current British and Maiden culture on it. This has been a flame-free message so please don't mistake it as being non-friendly argumentive rebuttal. Just a return of personal opinion and insights. On a Kate-note, anybody have any recommendations on the Kate Live at the Hammersmith-Odeon? Our local record store has the video. Any comments on the sound/camera quality? Highly recommended? Better recommendations? I'm still trying to win my wife over to Kate but it's not easy! She's not easy to convince on many things though. I'm still trying to get her to listen to Queensryche (another Kate fan Metal band!) with about the same results! She's not any easily convinced person! > -- Andrew > Remember, So-Cal L-Hs: party Friday Keep Rockin' !!! "Take Hold Of The Flame" - Queensryche '84 -- :[]: Mark "METAL" Ouellette - Calcomp, A Lockheed Company || (603) 885-8038 ( ) (__)