Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1986-08 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IED0DXM%UCLAMVS.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU
Date: Tue, 06 May 86 15:16 PDT
Subject: IED KT update, May 6
As usual, all verbiage from this correspondent concerns KT and KT only. IED0DXM has just received a load of earlier Love-Hounds material covering matters Ninth Waveological, and would like to thank Bill Hsu and Henry Chai, in particular, for their helpful analyses. The latest KBC Newsletter has apparently made it official: there is now a competition underway to decipher "what Kate is saying" in "Watching You Without Me", although the announcement does a bad job of pinpointing the position of this message within the track. The message still makes no more sense backwards than it does forwards, although it is clear that something is being said. There are two distinct sections, the second being a repeated phrase saying something like "Really see" (this is Doug Alan's hearing, not mine: could the words not be "We receive," or even "We recede"?). I will shortly submit to Love-Hounds a transcription of the first section as heard by me, but without any confidence of its accuracy. What interest me even more, however, are the two or three seconds immediately preceding this "backwards" track, during which time the Morse code signal for "S-O-S" can be clearly heard. I have no trouble with that message; however, if those moments are listened to again, another sound, like that of a high-pitched, wavering short-wave radio transmission, also becomes audible. Could this not be another message in Morse code, put on a loop and then sped up to nearly inaudible Hz levels? Who can clarify for me? Henry Chai preceded me, I note, in deciding that it was "unlikely" that the spelling of Organon was unintentional; but at this point I am willing to admit that even KT is able to commit errors, albeit of the most trivial kind. Knowing, however, of Kate's continued predilection for cigarettes, it is equally possible that the spelling is a veiled reference to an obscure document of 1659, written by the physician Walter Rumsey, entitled "Organon salutis: including divers new experiments of tobacco and coffee: how much they conduce to preserve humane health". Mr. Chai also noted that he had a hard time reading from the original works of Wilhelm Reich, because of the seriousness of his tone. This tone is precisely what makes Reich's pathology so fascinating (for as much as we may admire the beauty of his ideas and sympathize with the persecution he suffered at the hands of the U.S. government, it must be admitted that Reich was, at least by the late 1940s, quite mad). If Reich had simply taken to stumbling through the streets of Manhattan, spouting harangues to the effect that alien DOR forces were attacking the Earth in UFOs, and that the only way to stop them was to open fire by shooting blue Orgonotic energy rays into the sky through the agency of big metal pipes, he would not be remembered today, except, perhaps, for his early work in the field of Freudian psycho-analytic scholarship. But because he channeled his dementia into the narrow and highly disciplined forms of scholarly writing, developing a large body of Orgonotical literature and publishing heavily footnoted papers regularly in the Orgonon Press, his name lives on, and his work is still sporadically referred to by some of the flakier psychologists in business today. Partly out of a feeling of empathy for such a means of justifying one's obsessions, I have chosen to adopt Reich's pedantic forms and ponderous style in dealing with the work of Kate Bush, since this kind of obsessive interest in another person's life and work is better disguised, I think, when couched in the dry-as-dust language of the Orgonotic scholar. Only two corrections to be made, off hand, to the transcription of the dialogue in "Waking the Witch": The Priest asks, "What is it, child?" I think, not "What child, what child?" Also, in the "wake-up"-call section, I thought the male voice which screams simultaneously with the female chorus of "Your ma needs a shower. Get out of bed!" was not saying "Sunday at nine and you're sleeping in bed. Get up!" Rather, I hear: "Stop that lying and sleeping in bed. Get up!"I may be wrong about the latter line, however. Finally, I would like to relay the news that the promotional film for "The Big Sky" is listed as being available for licensed telecast in the May 8 (?) issue of Billboard. Since it is extremely unlikely that "The Big Sky" will be released as a single domestically, the film will in all probability be ignored by most video programmers, MTV included, unless we do something about it. Assuming everyone here wants to see and/or record it, I urge another MTV dial-a-thon, with the aim of getting at least one token cable-cast of "The Big Sky". Could someone suggest a date and time? Thanks. Hey! What's that? Looks like one of those...umm...