Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1986-05 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: The Electrician <wicinski@nrl-css.arpa>
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 86 16:26:19 est
Subject: Paisley Underground
Well, shucks, I could go on and on for days on the so-called 'paisley underground' stuff and my opinion/definition. but here are some random abuses to be heaped on anyone: 1. The Bangles are not part of this paisley movement. They might sound like it, but when I interviewed them they are very influenced by hardcore bands (they're brother is the drumnmer for Red Kross and Debbie Peterson was dating someone from White Flag). They're poppy, but not paisley. 2. Prince is not considered paisley, but more of a funk version of paisley. I doubt if he ever could do paisley right, but only funk version of this. 3. The Three O'clock are bad imitations of everything. I wouldn't call them competent. True West - nah Dream Syndicate - nah, but they are good. Plan 9 - Now here's a paisley underground band. The organ is what I feel gives the band a paisley or 60'ish sound. Bands like Question Marks and the Mysterions, the Lyres, the Pandoras (make the Bangles and the Go-Gos look like wusses), Choclate Watchband, ... I guess most of these people today are 'psuedo-paisley-underground' I'll worry about it later, with a midterm in my compilers class next week, I'm doing the right thand and going camping for a few days. later