Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1997-32 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IEDSRI@aol.com
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 1997 21:50:01 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Sam, Will and John on "meaning"
To: love-hounds@gryphon.com
<<The whole point of literature/art has really passed you by, hasn't it ? -- Will. >> IED just couldn't let this remark go by without complaining. What possible good can such a response serve? It's openly insulting and patronizing, yet it's also utterly devoid of content or argument. Sam's comments seemed to this reader powerfully reasoned, fair-minded and civil; they certainly didn't merit the above bit of fatuous nastiness. > It's music; he enjoys it; that's all that matters. For you, me or anyone else to > tell him his interpretation, whatever it may be, is incorrect or invalid -- > would pretty much redefine pedantry. This, too, is unfair. As this reader understood it, Sam's argument allowed quite happily for the freedom of anyone to "interpret" Kate's lyrics as they chose. He simply pointed out that a personal response, however valid or useful to the listener, is not the same as an informed understanding of intended meaning. It isn't pedantry to recognize the existence of an authoritative source for meaning -- namely, the creator of the message (in this case Kate Bush). Your seven-year-old son is to be applauded for loving Cloudbusting. But it would be foolish to look to your son for information about the meaning of the song's lyrics. > At night, music helps me unwind, and my interpretation and "analysis" becomes > entirely subjective. Fine! That's wonderful! But that doesn't make your interpretation and analysis *right*! It was clear from Sam's post that your response would be fine with him too. But simply because your interpretation and analysis of music is subjective doesn't mean that more objective interpretations and analyses should be dismissed as pedantry. It just means you choose to listen one way and Sam another. Whether you will enjoy or respond to the music more or less fully than he is beyond anyone's power to discover. But it's clear that Sam's way is far likelier to lead to a truer understanding of the intended meaning of the lyrics. -- Andrew Marvick (IED) S R I