Gaffaweb > Love & Anger > 1997-27 > [ Date Index | Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: This Woman's Work

From: "Ronald W. Garrison" <rwgarr@intrex.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 07:01:34 -0400
Subject: Re: This Woman's Work
To: rec-music-gaffa@moderators.uu.net
To: heisjohn@juno.com
Approved: wisner@gryphon.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: All USENET -- http://www.Supernews.com
References: <5tmse0$hh1@argentina.earthlink.net> <19970910.200855.12398.0.heisjohn@juno.com>
Reply-To: rwgarr@intrex.net

heisjohn@juno.com wrote:
> 
> Ron wrote:
> <major snippage>
> >So what is the "best" recording, from the standpoint of accurate
> >reproduction, may not sound as "natural" as you would like it to.
> With
> >such a highly produced work, you may find that you like a rendition
> of
> >it that obscures some of the sharper manifestations of all that
> >technology.
> 
> Yep, this is exactly what I was referring to.  The fourth and fifth
> order
> harmonics you get from HoL on an old boom box in an empty gym are
> pretty
> awesome :-)
> 
> John

...Yeah, I've had that kind of thing happen too, many times...

--Ron

-- 
http://www.intrex.net/rwgarr/