Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1997-26 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: len bullard <cbullard@hiwaay.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 1997 21:45:09 -0500
Subject: RE: Elton John
To: love-hounds@gryphon.com
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Blind Dillo
Reply-To: cbullard@hiwaay.net
chrisw@wwa.com (Chris Williams) >>Del Allen writes: >>I agree, bad mouthing other performers because they are not Kate, is bad >>mouthing Kate. > ...particulary as Kate considers Elton a major influence. Frankly, >it just looks ignorant. I must have missed this part. Did someone say Elton is bad because Elton isn't Kate??? That's weird on the face of it. John and I had a discussion with Wendy tossing in agreement that rewriting candle in the wind for Diana Spencer's funeral felt a bit contrived. I missed the rest of it. OTH, it seems a lot of people, including her sons, were emotionally affected by it so it had the right effect and in the eulogy mantra, that is what is important. Elton is a great and talented cat, but remember he has bragged for years that if he took longer than 30 minutes to write a song, he sent it to the O file. Thirty minutes doesn't seem too much to ask for the late Princess of Wales. I won't enjoy the remake and I won't buy it because everytime it opens, he'll sing "england's rose" and I'll hear "norma jean". it was and is, imho, a cognitively dissonant work. It's also history, so on with the show. BTW: found and read the Q review of the HOL remake. Worth having for the photo of Kate; otherwise, nyet. len