Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1997-10 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "Stuart M. Castergine" <scasterg@dispatch.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 11:00:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: tori bad?!?
To: Love-Hounds <love-hounds@gryphon.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <A18F78B6C39@roydmoor.shef.ac.uk>
Why would they bother to market someone as a clone of someone who is, in the American market, a rather minor, obscure cult artist? It would be like someone being marketed as a clone of Jane Siberry. On Mon, 12 May 1997, S.Irani-lewis wrote: > > > As most Kate Bush fanatics (read: me) would assert, Tori (not > > counting her Y Kant Tori Read phase) first come out as a direct > > rip-off of Kate. Her _Little Earthquakes_ album not only was > > an attempt to pass her off as a Kate clone, but even down to > > the album design, it was a horrible way to market Tori, > > Marketing rarely has anything to do with the artist......you > shouldn't hold the marketing managers limited imagination against > her.......its fairly obvious she has one! :-) > > Love Will......xx > > "Dark is the suede that mows like a harvest!" > > > mailto:scasterg@dispatch.com == Stuart Castergine | PGP: public key: --- All young gentle dreams drowning | finger |/ In life's grief | Ptcd@dialup.oar.net|\ Can you hang on to me? -Kate Bush, _Big Stripey Lie_