Gaffaweb > Love & Anger > 1997-10 > [ Date Index | Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]


Re: tori bad?!?

From: "Stuart M. Castergine" <scasterg@dispatch.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 1997 11:00:33 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: tori bad?!?
To: Love-Hounds <love-hounds@gryphon.com>
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <A18F78B6C39@roydmoor.shef.ac.uk>

Why would they bother to market someone as a clone of someone who is, in
the American market, a rather minor, obscure cult artist? It would be
like someone being marketed as a clone of Jane Siberry.


On Mon, 12 May 1997, S.Irani-lewis wrote:

>  
> > As most Kate Bush fanatics (read: me) would assert, Tori (not 
> > counting her Y Kant Tori Read phase) first come out as a direct 
> > rip-off of Kate.  Her _Little Earthquakes_ album not only was 
> > an attempt to pass her off as a Kate clone, but even down to 
> > the album design, it was a horrible way to market Tori, 
> 
> Marketing rarely has anything to do with the artist......you 
> shouldn't hold the marketing managers limited imagination against 
> her.......its fairly obvious she has one! :-)
> 
> Love Will......xx
> 
> "Dark is the suede that mows like a harvest!"
> 
> 
> 

mailto:scasterg@dispatch.com == Stuart Castergine | PGP: public key:  ---
All young gentle dreams drowning                  | finger             |/ 
In life's grief                                   | Ptcd@dialup.oar.net|\ 
Can you hang on to me? -Kate Bush, _Big Stripey Lie_