Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-37 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: IEDSRI@aol.com
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 23:48:29 -0400
Subject: Erratum
To: love-hounds@gryphon.com
Sender: owner-love-hounds
IED owes Michael Rees a debt of gratitude for calling attention to IED's foolish misuse of the term "semiquaver" in place of the intended "semitone". He trusts that anyone taking the time to read the posting in question (though god knows they must be few) will have managed to piece together IED's argument in spite of his stupid mistake. Meanwhile, he can only hope that this continued evidence of IED's fallibility will not somehow seem to tarnish the perfection of the art of Kate Bush itself, since of course her work is divine, IED's only all too mundane. -- Andrew Marvick (IED) S R I > You have compromised your credibility as a 'semiquaver' is a unit of _time_, > not of frequency (and, yes, I do realize that frequency is also time, but in > a different perceptual domain).