Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-33 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Allen Brunson <brunson@techcontrol.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Aug 1996 00:35:16 -0400
Subject: Re: execute
To: love-hounds@uunet.uu.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Technology Control Services Miami, Florida U.S.A.
References: <01I7QJJTQX3694GN2P@delphi.com>
Sender: owner-love-hounds
> "Execute" fits with the meter *much* better than a dippy two-syllable > word like "enter" or "return" ever could. KaTe is a poet, after all. > These things matter. :) (Several people said things along these lines. I chose this one to reply to, as representative of the lot.) Meredith -- You're absolutely correct, "execute" DOES fit the meter better, etc. But that's not the point. To my ear, it makes it sound like Kate is giving us yet another in a long line of media-presented images of computer cliches. If "enter" didn't fit the meter, then she should have completely rephrased that line so she wouldn't need either "execute" OR "enter." But then Alexander Fuchs pointed out that she's probably being sly, suggesting something with the word "execute" that I hadn't taken into account, because I was too busy being revolted by the apparent lack of computer savvy. C'est la vie. Allen -- I don't trust you Why should you trust me? -- The Clash