Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-24 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "Xenu's Sister" <vickie@miso.wwa.com>
Date: Wed, 29 May 1996 03:16:28 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: Re: Warning! New Kate Page!
To: Anders Hultman <anders.hultman@unisource.se>
Beware: of Scientology and Diantetics
cc: love-hounds@gryphon.com
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
In-Reply-To: <v02140b02add1d1fd0805@[193.44.96.160]>
Loves: Kate Bush/Happy Rhodes/Jane Siberry/Tori Amos/Peter Gabriel/Sarah McLachlan/Victoria Williams
Sender: owner-love-hounds
Web: http://miso.wwa.com/~vickie/
On Wed, 29 May 1996, Anders Hultman wrote: > Chris wrote: > > >This may sound like nepotisim, but a good example of frames being used > >properly, to add actual value to a page is Vickie's Happy Rhodes FAQ at: > > > >http://miso.wwa.com/%7Evickie/happy/faq.html > > > > I don't mention this because I love her, I mention this because she is > >a very good HTML writer *and* I spent a few evenings making sure that it > >worked right. This page give a choice of using frames or not, even if you > >are using a frames browser. I have some problems with the color choices > >(I'm a dark on light only man myself) but otherwise a good example. > > Well, in my browser this page is totally unreadable with light > green/blueish and purple text on a light patteren backgruond. YIKES! Something's wrong, because it's a black and dark blue patterned background, with lighter purple text. I swear to goddess I tried it on 5 different browsers and it looked fine. Maybe it's your monitor? :-) Don't take that wrong. I'll change it. I still have no idea why you see a *light* patterned background though. Weird. The same pattern is used for the FAQ too. Is that bad for you too? Vickie