Re: Kate being a witch

[chrisw@miso.wwa.com (Chris Williams)]

>Chris, to Samantha:
>
>>Do you really want to piss me off? 
>
>You seem to be a person who requires no assistance.

   Read the archives, ok? You'll find the *vast* majority of my posts are 
me supplying answers to questions. Honest. Try the following URL:

http://www.dejanews.com/forms/dnsetfilter.html

   ...and enter "rec.music.gaffa" in the "Newsgroups:" box, "1995" to "1997"
in the "From:" and "To:" boxes, and "chrisw@miso.wwa.com" in the "Author:"
box.

   Re-reading old posts, here's the things that annoy me:

   Astrology
   Religion
   Censorship

   That's it. You are perfectly welcome to post on those topics. I will
get annoyed. Such is life. 

>BTW, no, I am not Wiccan.  But their existence does not make me froth at the
>mouth. 

   I gave my reasons, and if you would look objectively at the posts from each
participant you might notice the following:

  * I'm not pissed. You should see me when I'm pissed. This is just annoyed.

   A very good example of me being pissed is the "Re: i don't know if it's
been signed yet but pass this on" thread answering some misguided people 
advocating censorship.

  * "Frothing" implies that my response is out of proportion. 

   Search the archives for appearances of the words "wicca" "wiccan" and 
"witch"...You might find that my annoyance is in proportion to the arrogance
of the majority of the posters using those words.

   All religions annoy me, but "Modern Paganisn" especially so, as there
is little excuse for it. Foolishness is forgivable. Willful foolishness isn't.