Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-16 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: violet@slip.net
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 1996 15:16:59 -0800
Subject: The Performer as "Artist"
To: love-hounds@gryphon.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-love-hounds@gryphon.com
Richard wrote: >I think I'd rather say that KaTe is a musician, but not a performer. She >produces beautiful objects, wether those objects are recordings or >images, but She decided She wasn't getting anything from producing them >anew each night. This is precisely the point -- the point in Kate's case, anyway, and the case of some other musical artists. Regardless of what we wish or think Kate should do, she is the one creating her "art." She's said before, in a variety of ways, that once she's done something, she's done it and doesn't feel the desire to keep doing that particular thing. Could you imagine making the same thing over and over and over? Some people can, yes. Some musicians can, yes. Some people like to play their songs a million times and can have just as much fun as the first. But Kate doesn't enjoy this, and that's her choice. It reminds me of something that Joni Mitchell likes to say, that musical artists are expected to keep playing their work night after night, but artists in other mediums are not expected to do anything of the kind. She says, "Can you imagine people going to see Van Gogh and saying 'Hey, paint "A Starry Night" again, man!'?" This is a brilliant, funny way of putting it into perspective. Some musicians stand on the "minstrel" side of the room, and they want to travel from town to town and perform the same things each night. Some musicians like to be more like artists working in the medium of sound, and when their "painting" is on tape, they hang it on the wall and move on. This is what Kate likes to do. Maybe WE wish she'd do it differently, but we don't really have a vote. And in the way that some artists like to do pastel drawings on the sidewalk and people can walk by and watch, a lot of musicians like the feeling of an audience and are happiest when hearing applause. Other artists like to hole up in little attic studios and paint away for years before their work sees the light of day. This is Kate. And Kate's way isn't unprecedented. Many of the classical composers did this same thing, even while some of their contemporaries were "touring" the countryside and playing for the masses. Just because there are music charts and stadium arenas and MTV now doesn't mean that a musician has to play this game. If Kate were physically a painter instead of a musician, would we be as hard on her about the way she goes about creating and the time she takes? Of course not. And to me, she is a painter of songs (although I will admit to liking some of her paintings more than others). :> Violet xoxox + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + "Disco isn't dead. It just smells that way." + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +