Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-05 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: nbuchwa1@ix.netcom.com (Norman Buchwald)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 04:35:42 GMT
Subject: Re: Kate vs. Tori
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: none, whatsoever!
References: <4e573gppv@gutemine.informatik.uni-kiel.d400.de> <patrickb-2901962156300001@wmn1-77.usa1.com>
Sender: owner-love-hounds@gryphon.com
patrickb@usa1.com (pkb) wrote: > I personally prefer Tori Amos. She seems to have a sense of working, >> while Kate takes so much time for new albums. >> >> CIAO, >> Mike > > MIKE-GET OUT OF HERE. > To actually even infer that Tori Amos even approaches Kate Bush in any >way only demonstrates the limits of your Musical Taste. Tori Amos copped >her sound from early KB records and wouldn't even own up to it. She is a >poser and a wannabe. And yes, she does "seem to have a sense of >working",alright, but it's P.R. work I guess we're copping from many people everday then. Both comments above I find rather assanine myself. Who's to say Kate isn't working? An artist does more than just spend ALL of her time at her work, you know. (You have to have a life before you can even create). And Tori doing P.R. work . . . give me a break. She probably has her influences, yes. She may have either conscious or unconsciously echoed Kate at times, but Tori's music is not Kate's. I think the claim that Tori is trying to be Kate is an absurd one. She has her own songwriting style and has done things with music that's not always similar to Kate's. Like Kate really came out of nowhere. She has her influences, too, though Kate's contribution has certainly been unique, startling to say the least. The Storm We all have a dream . . . maybe?