Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1996-04 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: gondola@deltanet.com (E.B.)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 01:29:25 -0800
Subject: Re: Has Kate already peaked?
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Delta Internet Services, Anaheim, CA
References: <199601131108.MAA25701@donald.interpac.be> <4d8mju$j2@ixnews4.ix.netcom.com> <AD25A0D496682AB95@flump.netkonect.co.uk>
Sender: owner-love-hounds@gryphon.com
HAS KATE PEAKED? Definitely (though I hope her next album proves me wrong). The Dreaming and Hounds Of Love were the pinnacle. I've always blamed her decline on too much technology. When she based her songs around piano and then layered the extras on top, she was brilliant. But then she discovered her Fairlight synthesizer, and it's been downhill ever since. Hounds Of Love is amazing, but you can already spot the seeds of decline: Instead of melodies, she's starting to work with "grooves" and samples. Actually, it's the same fatal mistake Bryan Ferry made a while back. She started PROGRAMMING her melodies rather than writing them, and her work has suffered terribly. I think I've listened to The Sensual World and The Red Shoes about twice. Granted, that's because I have a couple thousand other albums and so not much that those records are THAT lousy, but if I listed my favorite records of those two years, Sensual and Red Shoes would barely make my Top 40s. I'm sorta lukewarm on Tori Amos, who's so pretentious she makes Kate seem like the Go-Go's, but Jane Siberry's When I Was A Boy is a much better "Kate Bush record" than either Sensual or Red Shoes. Jes' my two cents.... Trying to stay faithful, E.B.