Re: I am Glad (or I hope) Kate does not see . . .

[undrtoad@ix.netcom.com (P. Dale Campbell )]

I wrote:
>>... On the other hand, I am glad (or I
>>*hope*) Kate does not see some of the crap that comes in to L-H! :)

In <456l50$k53@dewey.csun.edu> jbuchwald@csun.edu (Norman Buchwald)
writes: 
>      How do you know Kate is not reading the posts?  Unless "Deeper 
>Understanding" justified her need to be away from one (like it was a 
>drug?  And she may have a point.)  Still, she can easily read the 
>comments from time to time, maybe even join the conversation
underneath a 
>pseudonym.  You never can tell.  Regardless, that's one of the reasons

>why in my questionnaire (poll) I put in the "if you can ask Kate one 
>question," because maybe she'll read them!  (In addition to seeing
what 
>are our favorites, etc.)    
>                                                  Stormin' Norman

Comments in the past from people like IED and |} (|>oug), who have
apparent "ins" to the "organization", have indicated that KT was not
reachable via email.  Of course, I realize this could change at any
time
(one of the reasons I added the "hope" bit).  As for DU--I would bet
KT got the idea from a story she read about some poor spud who never
emerged from their larval stage.

Then again, maybe THAT's why the albums are taking longer and longer to
appear!

----
The UnderToad, (pDaleCampbell, pdCampbell@goodyear.com)
SIGless in Akron