Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1995-30 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Glen Ford <glen@gold.interlog.com>
Date: 25 Sep 1995 12:02:47 GMT
Subject: Re: Mea culpa (Re: Kate as a mum (Re: Artistic Categories)
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Ontario Lottery Corporation
References: <Pine.BSD.3.91.950923024945.3183C-100000@miso.wwa.com>
vickie@wwa.com (Anti-Scientologist) wrote: > >On Thu, 21 Sep 1995, Glen Ford wrote: > >> I take it you have not read "Cloudbusting". >> >> Kate has stated on more than one occasion that she did not see herself as >> the motherly type. > > >Chris and I checked _Cloudbusting_ using the keywords "mother," "kids," >and "children" and found quite a few entries. I was wrong. Kate did >say this: > >"I don't see myself as maternal" (Cloudbusting 3A - keyword "children" > starting line 1,469. From an article > called "What Kate Bush Did Next" 1985) > ^^^^ >Mea culpa (or whatever) > >However, if I don't know Cloudbusting by heart, then neither do you, >Mr Ford. (Who does, other than Ron and IED?) Your "I take it you have >not read 'Cloudbusting'" rankled a little. Have *you* read the *whole* >thing? A simple "In Cloudbusting she said she didn't see herself as >maternal. I don't remember exactly where at the moment but I'm sure >I saw it" would have sufficed. Read on... > >A couple of paragraphs later (line 1,506) Kate says this: > >"I suppose I am quite maternal, and it's something I'd like one of these >days" (referring to having children. From _Musician_ interview 1990) > ^^^^ > >1985 ----> 1990 ----> 1995 (buys a big, roomy house...why?) > >It's a lady's perogative to change her mind, especially when there's a >biological clock involved. It's a theory. Nothing more, nothing less. >It is mine. That's all. Ok bye. > >Vickie > > >"Ask a Scientologist about Xenu. They *hate* that" > > Check out alt.religion.scientology for the latest in Co$ criminal wear. > > Only Kate herself can settle this. Your logic is flawed at best. Here is an example of your logic: Suppose I have an argument with a neigbour. I go out and buy a gun. Your logic concludes that I am going to kill that neighbour. However, after all, it is the fall hunting season!!!