Gaffaweb > Love & Anger > 1995-06 > [ Date Index | Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]


Re: Pornography

From: kbfreakc@aol.com (Kbfreakc)
Date: 17 Feb 1995 20:17:47 -0500
Subject: Re: Pornography
To: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: America Online, Inc. (1-800-827-6364)
Posted-Date: 17 Feb 1995 20:17:47 -0500
References: <3h8884$c6n@news1.shell>
Reply-To: kbfreakc@aol.com (Kbfreakc)
Sender: root@aol.net

Hoorah, hoorah, I couldn't have said it better myself.  Contemporary
feminism tries to teach us that women are oppressed by men.  Like Kate,
you understand that women are just being what they want to be.  It is no
wonder that Kate is critical of modern feminism for making "feminine
energy" look stupid, and that she does not want to be too closely
identified with feminism.  I would think that Kate would realize that
Gloria Steinem is just as pathetic as is Phyllis Schlafly.  They both have
their idealogical boxes that they want to fit women into.  I think that it
is a good thing that they refuse to go, and that we have champions of
common sense like Kate around whose greatness is not predicated on being
hogtied to a certain idealogical position.  Kate Bush is great just being
herself!