Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1995-02 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: "Brian J Dillard" <dillardb@student.msu.edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 1995 00:08:57 -0500 (EST)
Subject: tltctc
To: love-hounds@uunet.uu.net (lovehounds)
Content-Length: 2163
Content-Type: text
my $.02 on the film: no plot? who the FUCK cares. obviously this was not supposed to be a pedestrian realism-style film. it is a fucking FAIRY TALE, for god's sake, and it has the same sort of plot that many fairy tales do. in a fairy tale, the protagonist often is faced with a strange otherworldly sort of logic and once they accept the rules of this particular reality, the find what they are looking for, be it a treasure, the meaning of life, or simply a way back to their own life. of course, the point is what they learn in their travels. the plot is subtle, and you have to THINK about clues kate gives tounderstand who her character is at the film's beginning and end and how they are different. so if you expect the meaning to be handed to you like in a judith krantz novel, it ain't gonna happen. unrelated songs? IED has already, far more eloquently than I could, pointed out that the songs in the film (and on the album) could indeed be related, although not in a narrative, linear way like the ones on, say, THW. The Dreaming and The Sensual World often are called concept albums, and i think TRS is one in the same way . . . . . the stylistic diversity is no greater than on The Dreaming, and the subject matter is no more diverse than on The Sensual World. I think the songs make perfect sense together, and the ones selected for the film especially work well together. we're not talking like madonna tried to string lucky star, bad girl, like a prayer and justify my love into a coherent narrative . . . . . kate's acting sucks? au contraire, in my opinion. i think her abilities are more than sufficient for what she has to do in the film . . . . . . also, half of the performance depends on other skills. singing obviously is no problem. the way she conveys emotion through dance, especially in MoP, is EXTREMELY moving. in an opera, you don't reduce your opinion of the lead to her acting. it's a synthesis of acting, singing, etc. the same with this type of film. she ain't garbo, but she gets the job done adequately on the acting side and more than makes up for it with the rest . . . . all in my ever so humble opinion. . . . . brian