Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-40 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: ROSEN RENEE LARCADE <rrosen@falcon.cc.ukans.edu>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 1994 18:15:04 -0600 (CST)
Subject: re: kate tarot
To: love-hounds <love-hounds@uunet.uu.net>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Reply-to: ROSEN RENEE LARCADE <rrosen@falcon.cc.ukans.edu>
Sender: ROSEN RENEE LARCADE <rrosen@falcon.cc.ukans.edu>
I personally think a Kate Tarot would be neat--prob. useless for divination purposes, but as there is a modern tradition of "art" Tarots (such as the Dali Tarot) where the Tarot is treated as an art form more than a tool for divination. As such, a Kate tarot would work (but until one tries to use it for divination, one will never know). I have a small collection of Tarot/cartomancy cards (6 decks or so), and a Kate deck would be an interesting idea. I also think that having only one or two people in charge of it would be best, merely from a logistics point of view. As for Tarot cards being designed by many artists, there is at least one deck I know of that was designed that way. I can't remember the name of it right now, but it was a feminist/lesbian deck and was round. (This is NOT the Motherpeace deck which is also feminist and also round.) The way I understood that they did it was that a few people were in charge, and they asked submissions and then chose the best ones for each card. In some cases, they couldn't decide or thought two were equally good, so they included both in the deck. Perhaps this system would work for a Kate deck? As for how Kate would react, there's only one true way to find out--ask her. After all, only she knows her opinions on the matter! Personally, I think a "true believer" would only be offended if they considered it to be a trivializing of the Tarot--but if it is treated as an "art" deck, then this would not be a problem. (How the purchasers of such a deck treat it is in itself another matter.) Renee