Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-30 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Tree of Schnopia)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 94 22:39:55 GMT
Subject: Re: It's The Red Shoes
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: University of Rochester - Rochester, New York
References: <378@arcadia.win-uk.net> <1994Sep21.163819.215@galileo.cc.rochester.edu> <35q48f$11uu@watnews1.watson.ibm.com>
Sender: news@cc.rochester.edu
In <35q48f$11uu@watnews1.watson.ibm.com> gregp@adexpbbs.sccsi.com (Gregg Primm) writes: >>Drewcifer, who thinks every human should own at least one Kate Bush album >Any _one_ in particular? Just curious. I mean, if every single person in the >whole world should have at least one of Her albums, which one would be most >appropriate? My vote goes for the obvious, HoL. Although TC is certainly >Her most challenging and "interesting" work, I honestly believe HoL is the >most fully realized and well-rounded of her albums. >Anyone? Anyone? You know, I've tried and tried to pick just one, and I can't do it for the life of me. TKI is full of amazing songs, but not as powerful and as rich in sound as the later stuff. L is very colorful but the overall picture is weaker than the other albums. NFE is brilliant, and possibly my favorite album, but I think I'd miss the raw power of TD and some of TRS if I had only that one to listen to. TD is incredible and rich and powerful and a cornucopia of ideas, both musical and lyrical. The trouble is that it's also very abrasive in places; I'd opt for a sound in between NFE and TD, that's raw but not grating, beautiful but not subdued. HoL is a work of genius, and maybe KaTe's most cerebral album in ways. It's not as colorful, though, as its predecessors, and it's difficult to separate the songs from each other. TSW is full of chills and deep, dark sounds, but the low spots haven't been this low since L. Also, the humor and playfulness of some of the earlier work is all but absent. TRS is bright, bold, and energetic, but not as solidly "artistic," whatever that means, as the mid-canon albums. Taken as a whole, KaTe's work is without parallel. But I can't disintegrate the collection. One album is better than none, but the whole is so much more than the sum of its parts. Mind you, all of this is my personal opinion, and I'm only interested in wasting my time arguing over it to a point. Drewcifer -- Andrew D. Simchik, as010b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu, simchik@cs.rochester.edu -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | "words weren't made for cowards" -- Happy Rhodes | Tree of Schnopia | --------------------------------------------------------------------------