Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1994-26 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: WretchAwry <vickie@pilot.njin.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 94 23:25:04 EDT
Subject: Re: anAmosity persisting
To: brady@onramp.net (Jim Brady)
Cc: rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
In-Reply-To: Your message of Thu, 25 Aug 1994 22:52:57 -0400
Loves: Kate Bush..Happy Rhodes..Jane Siberry..Tori Amos..Peter Gabriel..
> Ah, the *bulk* of coincidences in style, voice, album cover, persona > (this is getting SO EXTREMELY BORING) should lead any fan of either or > both to conclude and accept and get on with the idea that Tori is a > really very talented clone. > Someday she may develop something original, and we'll all be gladly > waiting, and until then there really, truly is NOTHING ELSE TO SAY ! I enjoy these debates only up to the point where they become actual Tori-bashing, and then it stops being fun. Tori is *already* an original, and Kate fans who bash Tori look just as silly and uninformed as Tori fans who bash Kate. There are *lots* of us who love and appreciate both. Taste is one thing (you don't *have* to like either one or the other if you truly don't like the music) but to junk Tori as a Kate clone is obnoxious and insulting. I get angry at the suggestion (in any form) that there is only enough room on this planet for one female singer, and that anyone who follows after is, of course, a clone and a rip/spin-off. Kate may be God to some (she is to me) but there are *many* wonderful female singer/songwriter/musicians, and there's plenty of room in the world for them all. We'd all better give this a rest before it gets out of hand. Vickie