Re: What does it matter?

[P.R.Houghton@newcastle.ac.uk (P.R. Houghton)]

In article <CMM-RU.1.4.767523271.vickie@pilot.njin.net>, vickie@pilot.njin.net (WretchAwry) writes:
> Why say *anything* about Kate's looks in the FAQ? There's no need to
> say "yes, she's a fox" or "yes, she is beautiful" or anything else.
> Those with eyes can see. It's as silly as saying "yes, she is a woman"
> or even "yes, she has two arms and two legs" because it's irrelevant
> to her *MUSIC*.
> 
> Vickie
> 
> ps, "zaftig"? geez
> 
It may be for you, but for most male Kate fans, I shouldn't think it is.  Kate's
music relies very heavily on her sexuality, as does our appreciation of it. 
Divorcing Kate from her physical and spiritual attractiveness is like saying the
fact that Michaelangelo's David is naked has nothing to do with its quality.  It
is completely impossible.