Re: Kate and Joseph Campbell

[chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu (chris williams)]

In article <9312280211.tn33827@aol.com> you write:
>Hola:
>
>Does anyone know about the relationship between Kate and Joseph Campbell?  Is
>she talking about the real J.C. on the notes of TRS? Does Kate know J.C.? Can
>anyone enlighten me on this  subject?  Thank you.

   Joseph Campbell has been dead for a while, so I kind of doubt if they
have a close relationship. Kate could have been reading JC's works and
may have been impressed enough to credit him (posthumously) on the
album. Or this could be another person named Joseph Campbell.


                          Chris Williams of
                             Chris'n'Vickie of Chicago
                               chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu (his)
                                 vickie@njin.rutgers.edu      (hers)

From: satyr!buck@apple.com  Tue Dec 28 08:10:30 1993
From: satyr!buck@apple.com (Michael Butler)
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1993 08:06:50 -0500
Message-ID: <m0pEe7J-000AK6C@satyr>
Errors-To: Love-Hounds-request@uunet.UU.NET
Subject: (no subject given!)
Lines: 28

Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Path: buck
From: buck@satyr.sylvan.com (Michael Butler)
Subject: Re: Kate and Joseph Campbell
Message-ID: <CIqxp6.6xI@satyr.sylvan.com>
Organization: Sylvan Associates
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1993 13:05:28 GMT
References: <9312280211.tn33827@aol.com>

In article <9312280211.tn33827@aol.com> joseba@aol.com writes:
>Hola:
>
>Does anyone know about the relationship between Kate and Joseph Campbell?  Is
>she talking about the real J.C. on the notes of TRS? Does Kate know J.C.? Can
>anyone enlighten me on this  subject?  Thank you.
>
>Joseba
>
>You were born and so you're free, so happy birthday-Laurie Anderson

"The real?"  Begs the question, dunnit?

Well, I know *I* sent her some of Joseph Campbell's books a while back
(might have been '87)--I would be surprised if I were the only person
who ever thought she might be interested.

Michael Butler

From: BOYD@unb.ca  Tue Dec 28 10:52:14 1993
From: "Ottis R." <BOYD@unb.ca>
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1993 10:49:16 -0500
Subject: Re: "Lily" and religious references
Message-ID: <28DEC93.12742391.0033@UNBVM1.CSD.UNB.CA>
Organization: The University of New Brunswick
References: <9312271639.AA21116@relay1.UU.NET>
Apparently-To: uunet!rec-music-gaffa@uunet.uu.net
Lines: 16

In article <9312271639.AA21116@relay1.UU.NET> nessus@mit.edu (Douglas Alan) writes:
>     ==[deleted stuff]==
>How does this incorporation of angels into paganism work?  Who do the
>angels now work for?  Do they now have a different boss?  Or have they
>been emancipated?
>
>|>oug

It's just a continuation of the natural (?) progress of religion ...
I gather that a number of Judeo-Christian "demons" were culled from
the ranks of "angels" in older religions. I think this is probably
because the old religion didn't do its job effectively (i.e. didn't
make people feel as good as they thought it should), and had to be
replaced.
   Wondering what's next ...    <>ttis      ;)