Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-45 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Mike Mendelson <MJM@ZYLAB.MHS.CompuServe.COM>
Date: 10 Nov 93 15:22:14 EST
Subject: resisting the urge...
To: <Love-Hounds@uunet.UU.NET>
Alex Gibbs: |I personally can't get into this song-by-song analysis, at least not |at this stage. I think it's because I'm still forming my own opinions |or maybe because I'm obsessive enough without doing that! :) I'm not |sure. Maybe it's because I know we will all feel differently anyway. |Also, something about dissecting it into pieces and actually grading |the pieces sort of bugs me. Am I alone in this? This is a good point and I think it underscores peoples basic need to categorize, compartmentalize, pigeonhole, and get a "handle" or control over things. It happens everywhere. Our society is rife with this. And, I think it is human nature to try to deconstitute complex entities into easily identifiable pieces. Take Kate Bush album listening as an example of this. Everyone is on the edges of their seats waiting and anticipating the new music. As soon as it is out, the race is literally on to listen and form quick opinions. "Oh boy, I got the album, I listened to it 7 times in 2 hours, now I can write my song-by-song breakdown and conveniently know which songs I like, which ones I hate, and I can validate those feelings by broadcasting to my gaffa peers." Why, the same thing happens in politics. Sound-bites. Quick analysis after the Perot/Gore debate for example. Before it's even over, the media has decided who won, who lost, why, and what will happen as a result. Well, politics is perhaps slightly more quantifiable than music. I mean, God forbid I should listen to TRS 20 times consecutively and *still* not know *exactly* how I feel about each and every track. For myself, I know that each time I hear, I react a little differently, based on factors to numerous to enumerate: Where am I when I listen? What mood am I in? Is it daytime? Morning? Nighttime? Am I in bed? In the shower? Eating lunch at work? Driving to a party? Leaving a lecture? We all listen to music all the time in so many different contexts, it's impossible to have the same reaction every single time. There are times when I've listened to TRS and, as a whole, said to myself, "This album just does not work for me... it really leaves me cold." But, then there are other times I've listened to it, or to parts of it, and said "yeah those 4 songs in that sequence really work for me," or "I don't care much for The Red Shoes but Top of the City is genius," or "Eat the Music is great" or "it sucks." It just depends so much. Now over a continuum of time, these opinions converge, although I would say never completely. I am rarely in the mood to listen to TSW, for example, but on the autumnest of days, when I'm driving amidst grey skies and swirling leaves, there is nothing better than TSW. My impression of TRS, is that it too has a "personality". I like to view albums like this as a whole, rather than as a simple collection of songs. My opinion of TotC is already bound up as much in its own strengths as in my anticipation thereof while listening to TRS, or even the whole part of the album that precedes it. Then again, I had a friend in college who insisted that people's concentration spans are so slim that they require constantly changing soundscapes so as not to get bored. Thus the advent of the LP, as opposed to the once-dominating 45 (single). And radio, or course, in which stations now offer rewards to listeners who catch them playing the same song more than once in a 24-hour span. I remember sitting pasted to a chair at Wayne's behest listening to just one song over and over for hours. Hard Habit to Break by Chicago. Levon by Elton John. It's amazing how these songs became a part of me after continued saturation. When I hear them now, I still love them. How many people have listened to any of the songs on TRS over and over? [Actually, I'd be hard-pressed to think of even one song that I'd be willing to do this for, which I suppose speaks volumes. But some songs do work better in an album context than alone.] On the other hand, I'd happily be confined for hours in a room with GOOMH playing on infinite loop. So, in conclusion (:-), I would question the point of reviewing on a song-by-song basis this early in the game, and moreover, I would urge people to *resist* the urge to form compartmentalized, often trivializing opinions on individual songs when their merits are so irrevocably bound up in factors that transcend single-songedness. Once an encapulation is made, it is often hard (though certainly not impossible) to undo... even if it is a first impression. But of course you should all do whatever you want anyways... :-) [hope this was somewhat cogent and coherent] -mjm