Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-40 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Andrew B Marvick <abm4@columbia.EDU>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 93 14:56:05 EDT
Subject: MisK.
To: Love-Hounds@eddie.mit.edu
"Pete Hartman", who feels that Kate Bush's new work is "boring", then protests that "to imply that we are simply uncultured barbarians incapable of understanding her divine subtlety is...ridiculous at best." There appears to be a dearth of evidence to support this claim. Why is it ridiculous? IED doesn't remember off-hand who made the implication to which Pete refers, but for convenience's sake, IED will state outright that anyone who can dismiss "Eat the Music"'s new video as merely "boring" is, without any question, missing out on quite a lot. Another polite way of putting it: Mr. Hartman's argument fails to convince... -- Andrew Marvick (IED), who is reminded of the great, all-consuming question: "What do you mean, 'That's it'?!" Well, perhaps "reminded" isn't the word for it -- more accurately, a giant shouting chorus in his brain keeps telling him, "THAT'S IT!" and he keeps answering, "What do you mean, 'That's it'?!" and then his brain skips back again a moment later, shouting "THAT'S IT!" and he answers, "What do you mean, 'That's it?!" and then...No sleep in two days now...