Re: An r.m.g peace-plan for Kate, on her 35th

[larry@cs.com (Larry Spence)]

In article <m0oKtiG-000D7CC@chinet> jorn@chinet.com (Jorn Barger) writes:
>
>Since Andy hasn't mentioned the traditional roses yet this year, can I 
>propose a birthday gift for Kate that would really have to come from each 
>of us, from our deepest levels of affection and respect and gratitude?

Let me guess, we're going to stop gushing over Kate as if she were some
superhuman deity?

>It's not even *that* much to ask:  just, suppose we all agree to police 
>ourselves to the extent of *labelling our flames* in our Subjectlines as 
>"FLAME", so that one simple killfile entry will serve for all time, to 
>spare the Tenderhearted from the Terrible?  { :^)

Sure, as long as there's also a Subject: tag of "WOOLY THINKING" or perhaps
"PSEUDOPOETIC WANKING" on certain other posts.  %)

-- 
Larry Spence
larry@cs.com
uunet!csccat!larry