Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-14 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: jondr@sco.com
Date: Thu, 1 Apr 93 10:36:05 PST
Subject: Re: Magic 109 special ed
To: love-hounds@uunet.UU.NET
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
References: <9303311450.aa01697@rpierre.sco.com> <C4sKAu.J23@chinet.chi.il.us>
Sender: jondr@sco.com
jorn continues his insane tirade: >I've been trying to build a defense-of-ESP out of next-to-nothing, why bother? it must be awfully tiring for you. >which I see as an *extremely honorable* enterprise, it seems like a grand waste of time to me. do you enjoy being made a fool of in front of thousands of people on a daily basis? if so, more power to you. >and I've been subjected >to an insane barrage of abuse from people who imagine they're being >"scientific" by trying to squelch me! i don't want to squelch you. i want you to seriously examine your proposition and explain the myriad of flaws to the love-hounds readership. no, jorn, it is NOT sufficient to say, "i'm treading into untested grounds here and because it is outside of known science, i have no need to justify it other than by repeating it over and over ad nauseum until my foes get tired of typing follow-up articles." larry spence is doing an admirable job at presenting the questions i would ask minus the vitriol. you could at least answer *his* questions nicely while spewing your reeking piss-prose all over me. >Why are you directing this to me, rather than to Drukman & company, who >blatantly tried to impose their views on me, by flaming me for presenting >*my* views? You've got *zero* perspective, kid. jorn, you don't have to believe what i believe. i honestly don't care and i think i might even PREFER it if you stay out of my belief system. i just want to you to look at what *you* believe and admit that it makes no sense. >Briefly, then and now, I stand for kindness to those who intend kindness, and >full-flamed self-defense against folks who don't. you also stand for half-baked theories that you have no desire to defend against even the lightest critical scrutiny. why even bother posting something like that in love-hounds if you don't intend to discuss it like an intelligent human? i repeat, saying "it's a spiritual thing that you idiot materialists won't understand" is NOT an argument. >No, you d*mb f*ck, my freedom and rights involve presenting an argument and >being treated with respect. when you start acting in a manner deserving of respect, you'll get it. >Jonni, here's a clue: your shit gets so ugly because you're insensitive of >others feelings. Have at least a half a heart, things will *have* to get >better. (Ahhh, I feel the *70s* comin' on... ;^) jorn, you are so woefully ignorant of my life outside of what you see on a computer screen. it would be hilarious if it weren't so tragic. separate the electronic persona from the person behind it, if you can. i don't think you can. but don't worry - a lot of truly stupid people have that problem, you know. it's like telling IED from Andrew Marvick. you can do it, jorn. i BELIEVE in you. come on, give it the ole college try... -- Jon Drukman (an emulsifier) jondr@sco.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.