Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1993-06 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: sandoval@stsci.edu
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 1993 14:47:24 GMT
Subject: Re: A letter to Kate???
Distribution: na
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Space Telescope Science Institute
References: <19590.9301061256@subnode.epcc.ed.ac.uk> <1993Jan7.080926.18869@midway.uchicago.edu>
Sender: news@stsci.edu
In article <1993Jan7.080926.18869@midway.uchicago.edu>, chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu (chris williams) writes: > In article <19590.9301061256@subnode.epcc.ed.ac.uk> s.telford@edinburgh.ac.uk (Scott Telford) writes: >>sandoval@stsci.edu's message of Thu, 31 Dec 1992 21:27:53 GMT: >> >>> Anyway, I have what may be a strange question. I've been reading all of >>> this Kate stuff lately from the archives (Cloudbusting, The Garden, etc..) >>> and it's really made me want to write Kate to thank her for all they joy >>> her music has given me. I've never written to a performer before, so where >>> should I send my letter? I'd assume that I could send it to the record >>> company, but then I'm afraid they'll just send me a form letter and Kate >>> will never actually see my letter. >> >>Better to send it c/o the KBC, which she *does* keep in contact with. >>Better still, try East Wickham Farm - after all, if her studio's there, >>she's going to pick up the mail pretty frequently! > > She *might* read it, but the family has a policy of not replying to > *anything* sent directly to the Farm. Andy (IED) has sent a dozen white > roses to Kate on her birthday for years, but other than the time at the > convention, Kate and her family have never acknowleged them. The KBC > is the best route, and Kate *has* replied to letters sent there. But > don't expect a reply, and you won't be disapointed. > > Chris Williams > chrisw@fciad2.bsd.uchicago.edu > Chris, Thanks for the info. A reply would be nice, mainly just to know that she got it. But I'd never expect one. It'd just be a nice surprise. :) I'll give the KBC a try. Thanks again. John