Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-36 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: cjm@iris.mincom.oz.au (Chris Moran)
Date: 14 Dec 92 03:13:25 GMT
Subject: Re: Sound quality / Peter Gabriel's "Us"
To: rec-music-gaffa@munnari.oz.au@munnari.OZ.AU
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Mincom, Brisbane, Australia
References: <fester.723754426@parnasus>
Reply-To: chris.moran@mincom.oz.au (Chris Moran)
George Ludwig (fester@parnasus.dell.com) wrote: : While I'm still not sure about my position on TSW, I must agree that : my first reaction on listening to US was that the sound quality was : very muffled. There's like no high end to be found on the record. I'm : not sure what "novel technique" you're referring to, but I recall : reading on the liner notes that many of the rythm tracks were : originally recorded on location in the early 80's. God only knows what : Peter was using for a deck...nagra? 14-bit Casio DAT? Walkman : Professional? But I suspect that he used a lot of these ryhtms : (recorded under less-than-ideal circumstances) and didn't want to make : them stand out for their lack of quality. Thus, (and this is merely a : theory) the "subdued" mix of most of the other tracks. The lack of high-end I believe is deliberate, and not a result of poor recording. The mood of the album is dark and cathartic, not joyous, and a rolled-off high-end helps establish this. Chris Moran chris.moran@mincom.oz.au