Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1992-01 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Jane Francksen <FRANCKSEN@CHEERS.gs.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 1992 06:15:00 -0800
Subject: single gun theory
To: Love-Hounds@eddie.mit.edu
thanks to whoever recommended the latest "single gun theory". i bought it before christmas and it's hardly been out of the machine since. although i like it a lot, i feel it has some glaring faults. firstly, the album is no more than the sum of its parts. i get the feeling that if you put anybody half competent in a studio with a female "indie-style" vocalist, a decent drum-machine and lots of mainly ethnic samplings, and played them "my life in the bush of ghosts" enough they'd be able to do as well or better. only rarely do the components really interact and become something bigger (eg "i am what i see"). secondly, the lyrics are pretty pedestrian and banal.(eg "great palaces of immortal splendour" sounds like it came out of a twelfth-grade poetry anthology, try "i ain't no student of ancient culture, but i know a neat excavation" instead). they sing about a man murdering his lover and the nuking of baghdad. in the mouths of an indie band it all sounds quite well-meaning and sympathetic, but the words are so devoid of any emotional register that if you imagined the same songs recorded by let's say a heavy metal band with a male vocalist, it would sound quite offensive. i guess what i'm saying is that it lacks any signs of conviction or genius. that said, i still like it and listen to it & if there are any earlier albums in a similar vein which sound a bit dirtier i'd like to hear. jane