Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-38 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: boris%monsoon.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (Boris Chen)
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1991 19:47:23 -0700
Subject: Re: Love-Hounds Digest #7.313
To: <love-hounds@wiretap.spies.com>
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: ucb
References: <1991Oct16.052554.2881@agate.berkeley.edu> <9110161709.AA10109@lewhoosh.umd.edu>
Sender: usenet%agate.Berkeley.EDU@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU (USENET Administrator)
In article <9110161709.AA10109@lewhoosh.umd.edu> jeffy@lewhoosh.umd.EDU (Jeffrey C. Burka) writes: >Boris sez: > >>What's funny, is that Laurie seems to get her data messed up. I heard >>that its about up to 70 cents per buck that a man makes. > >You're right--the earnings gap is currently at around 70%--but here's a >partial list of female:male earning ratios: > >year cents a woman makes to a man's dollar >1955 64 >1960 61 >1965 60 >1970 59 >1975 59 >1980 60 >1983 64 > Thanks for the info. Can you tell me your source? >were almost 30 years later. The ratio may well have fallen back down to >63 cents when she did her research for "Beautiful Red Dress," which must >have been in '88 ("It'll be the year 3 thousand 6 hundred eighty-eight before True. Good point. > >>But regardless, >>those stats may be misleading since: 1) more men work than women, >>2) women on average have jobs that inherently pay less; it may have >>little to do with unequal pay for jobs, but of course, I know that >>unequal pay exists. It's just that it probably isn't as bad as she >>says. > >You're missing the entire point. > >It doesn't matter whether women earn less money through unequal pay for the >same jobs that men do or whether they tend toward jobs that pay less, or >whether women tend to have less education, leading to lower paying jobs. Well, I think it does. (for what it's worth) If women in general choose carreers that pay less than men, then that is their individual choices. I don't think it is bad or good. Why major in engineering over english? Just because it pays better? That would be silly. If some women want to sacrifice their career for their family, I'd say, good for them. And if some men want to sacrifice their career for their family, I'd say the same (and Believe it or not, there are men who do that). I think that is a very noble thing to do. Money isn't everything, and I'd pick a good family over a great career anytime. The bad thing is when a person; can't do what she/he wants to do. And that happens, and I think it is bad. Does sexism exist? Yes. Is there oppression? Yes. Is it as bad as LA says? I don't know. As the above figures show, it isn't as straigh forward and simplistic as LA says. But keep in mind that she isn't doing a lecture, she is making a statement with humor. --------------- And all you people stop sending me mail saying I am sexist and offensive. Just like all of you, I am thinking about the ham and cheese sandwiches in the next room. So leave me alone, or else I'll sling one of those slimy creatures that have plates for heads and telescopes for eyes at you. (divert all futher discussion to soc.women or soc.men; your pick; I don't read either of them) --boris