Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-28 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Peter Byrne Manchester <PMANCHESTER@ccmail.sunysb.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 1991 21:53:00 -0800
Subject: Digest busted
To: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu
Cc: pmanchester@ccmail.sunysb.edu
Like the first rain after a drought, a Love-Hounds Digest for Sunday, August 11 just posted. I was beginning to get paranoid: last Tuesday, August August 6, I had posted a reply to Jon Drukman, but Wednesday 8/7 there was no digest. And indeed for the next six days, total drought. Including no reply from love-hounds-request@eddie.mit.edu, or wisner@ims.alaska.edu. Either the lh digest was broken, or I had been purged. Damn! Bandy words with Drukman, and the whole machine spits you out! Paranoia threatened to set in. Tonight's new digest indicates I was not alone. I am going to re-post my apparently lost post from Tuesday night separately, but I would like to comment on Richard Caldwell's suggestion that perhaps the technical arrangement in place between rec.music.gaffa on USENET and love- hounds@eddie.mit.edu on INTERNET needs to be reconsidered. I have no access to USENET and have never been able to touch base with gaffa direct. I don't even begin to comprehend what sort of a thing USENET is so I can't really make any informed technical comments about whatever happened this past week. But I do remember |>oug Alan taking the side of those of us who only see the exchanges of the newsgroup via the Digest a couple of years ago, and I would like to speak again on behalf of those of us who are in that boat. I would guess that we are in the majority, though no numbers have recently been circulated. Under the Bill Wisner regime, the Digest has been totally regular and dependable, with this the first and only technical fiasco (whatever it was). I hope that no technical maneuver that would disadvantage the Digest subscribers will be necessary in the aftermath. The lapse in our conversation has been traumatic enough that whatever response is appropriate, I hope that an explanation in enough detail is forthcoming for us to share in any recommendations for changes of policy and practice. ............................................................................ Peter Manchester "C'mon, we all sing!" pmanches@sbccmail.bitnet pmanchester@ccmail.sunysb.edu