Gaffaweb > Love & Anger > 1991-25 > [ Date Index | Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]


Re: all these dids, all these biases

From: jessica@athos.rutgers.edu (jessica)
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 1991 20:21:27 -0800
Subject: Re: all these dids, all these biases
To: rec-music-gaffa@rutgers.edu
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Rutgers University Computing Services
References: <9107231911.AA26297@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL>


fingerle@NADC.NADC.NAVY.MIL (J. Fingerle) writes:

>P.P.S.  Why is it musically correct to like/respect New Edition (and its 
>spinoffs Bell Biv Devoe, Bobby Brown, etc) when it is musically incorrect
>to like/respect the New kids?  the same Svengali created them both for 
>the sole purpose of generating $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$.

*Is* it musically correct to "like/respect" New Edition????

I had no idea there was a set and universal definition for "musically
correct".

Perhaps, if this is true for you, then you shoudl really ask yourself
the question. Or perhaps, instead of asking why this is so, ask *who
else* feels that way?

personally, I don't.

	      	jessica

-- 
|| jessica  || It is this that || Don't try to tell me there's no reason for ||
|| lawrence ||    brings us    || any moment in time, every memory of mine.  ||
|| koeppel  ||    together.    || Those years are lines of color on my face, ||
|| dembski  ||        --Kate   || the past is warpaint.     --Happy Rhodes   ||