Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-22 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: larry@csccat.cs.com (Larry Spence)
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 1991 20:13:37 -0800
Subject: Re: Brevity is the essence of wit..
To: uunet!rec-music-gaffa@uunet.UU.NET
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Computer Support Corporation, Dallas, Texas
References: <XmoX42w164w@darkside.com>
Reply-To: csccat!larry@uunet.UU.NET (Larry Spence)
In article <XmoX42w164w@darkside.com> bullroar@darkside.COM (Mark Kraft) writes:
>I'm quite sure that we all like lots of muscians, and that is quite an
>admirable quality to have.. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Apparently you haven't read the post in r.m.music by the girl who would
"give [her] very life to see Morrissey." %) %)
>Could we at least agree to urge the weeding out of these
>offending double-posts and make references to previous posts without quoting
>the post verbatim ad nausea?
When people are engaged in an argument where they're disagreeing about what
various parties have said/implied, we're going to see old posts quoted. To
the extent that I follow things like the AATHP/LL flames (not much), I don't
want someone to make unsupported accusations. Quoting the other side's exact
words can be tedious, but necessary.
>This is really a magazine, of sorts, and as
>such, we should issue a certain discretion to make sure that what we write
>isn't too redundant.
Another factor is that people all over the world see a post within maybe a
few hours of each other, and many reply within hours of each other. So we
end up with a bunch of posts that all quote the same posting. I can't see
how this could be avoided without heavy moderation and a considerable delay.
I would prefer to get everything ASAP and do my own editing. Subscribe to
Homeground or whatever if you want it all neat and tidy (and boring)...
>Just keep it informative, to the
>point, and entertaining. We shouldn't try to be excessively American in our
>hit & run viewpoint of entertainment,
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Oh, I see, that's all Kate is to you, _entertainment_, huh?!? %)
>but it would be nice to see more
>information and a tad less bickerring.
There's not that much going on, Kate-wise, thus the various arguments & etc.
Do you have some Tour O' Life Mark II info for us, hmm? %)
--
Larry Spence
larry@csccat.cs.com
..{uunet,texsun,cs.utexas.edu,decwrl}!csccat!larry