Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-21 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: harvard!unix.sri.com!fernwood!well!rickt@EDDIE.MIT.EDU (Rick Thompson)
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1991 22:41:05 -0800
Subject: Re: Musical tastes and tasteless arguments
To: love-hounds@eddie.mit.edu
In article 9106190910.AA02366@greylady.uoregon.edu Steve VanDevender writes: >Richard also wrote: >>Interestingly enough, one lurking reviewer dropped me a line >>declaring my remark about synths to be "dead on". >I'd love to see this lurking reviewer post his opinion, because I >appreciate honest opinions. However, I consider citing one's OK. Here he is. Richard asked me if I thought Happy relied heavily on synthesizers and was otherwise sparsely instrumented. I replied that I thought that was "dead on the money." You seem to think so, too, since you also write: >_Rearmament_ right now and I have to admit that it, like all her >other albums I've heard, has synthesizer sounds that have come to >be considered primitive, even cheesy. However, I am really quite [Stuff deleted] >instruments herself. It is no surprise that Happy must settle >for sparse instrumentation and simple melodies when she cannot I mailed that commentary privately to Richard because 1) I hated to contribute to the deluge of Happy/unHappy messages here; 2) It was in the context of offering to give away my copy of the _Warpaint_ CD, and I thought it was impolite to make such a private offer in public; and 3) The e-mail on that service is free to me, which r.m.g is not. In any case, my saying that Happy's music seems largely synth-based and sparsely instrumented isn't much of a review. Nor does Richard need to call on "private supporters," since _you yourself_ concede this. If he was trying to trash Happy, he probably would have excerpted the portion of my message that called _Warpaint_ "unobjectionable enough, but basically boring," instead. One last point, since I seem to dropped out of my preferred lurk mode: harsh though it may sound, neither Happy's lamentable finances, nor her past personal problems make her music sound any better to me. If it bores me, it does. If other people find beauty there, then I'm glad for them, but even knowing that the artist is working under the most limited conditions can't make me enjoy music I don't enjoy. Insular as it may sound, I think I'd prefer Kate with only a piano to Happy with an unlimited budget for instrumentation. ================================================================= | rickt@well.sf.ca.us | "And I don't know when | | J. R. Thompson (Rick) | But just saying it could | | Upstate NY | even make it happen..." |