Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1991-10 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: neff@hp-vcd.vcd.hp.com (Dave Neff)
Date: 26 Mar 91 18:28:57 GMT
Subject: Why Deify Kate?
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: Hewlett Packard, Vancouver, WA
I just don't get it ... In this newsgroup it seems that Kate is more than a mortal, she is a venerated deity. People testify of "how they found Kate" as if she were some sort of religious conversion. Some of her music ("The Dreaming" in particular) is the "Platonic" ideal/archetypical album of which all other albums are but shadows of this ultimate reality. I do think Kate is talented. Her creativity is in the same league as people like Peter Gabriel and Bryan Ferry (and a few others I could list). But she is but a talented, mortal artist. In fact, I would doubt that even her works will be "immortal" (unlike those of the classical masters). I doubt that 200 years from now anyone will be listening to Kate or Peter Gabriel, or most of our current rock greats. There may be some contemporary artists whose work endures for centuries (perhaps some of the Beatles material). I like Kate's music. I like Peter Gabriels music. I like Bryan Ferry's music. Sometimes the music is quite moving. But I don't venerate or deify any of these artists or their works. Is there something about Kate being a woman (and an attractive one at that) which adds to this tendancy of some (generally men may I add) who venerate her person and material? I just don't get is ... Dave Neff neff@hpvcfs1.HP.COM