Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1990-18 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: Lolly Loggerheads <jsd@gaffa.MIT.EDU>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 90 10:14:02 -0400
Subject: Re: All Quiet On The Gaffa Front
Newsgroups: rec.music.gaffa
Organization: The Zik Zak Corporation -- "Know Future"
References: <9006290758.AA16076@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>
Reply-To: jsd@gaffa.UUCP (Jon Drukman)
>Really-From: nrc@cbema.att.com (Neal R Caldwell, Ii) > >As things get strangely quiet here on Love-Hounds I realize that I'm >having still another new Kate-related experience. Just as I had never >experienced the bliss of an new Kate Bush release prior to _The >Sensual World_ I have never experienced the profound letdown of it >being "over". Yes, but wait til you experience the profound letdown of a once-great artist releasing an album of unlistenable crap. OF COURSE I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT KATE, YOU DWEEBS. (Actually, I was thinking more of Mike Oldfield, but I don't wanna talk about that.) >I believe that the increasing involvement of Del Palmer in Kate's work >did not have a positive affect on _The Sensual World_. Perhaps even the >contrary. Oooh, juicy juicy juicy! Explain exactly what you mean, please! >Jorn Barger reports his disappointment at the arrival of a very low >key official Sensual World T-shirt. John, where have you been? Low-key >seems to be what Kate is all about these days. This is one case where the bootleg surpasses the official product. >of unwashed masses. Well, unless you count the occasional, "Do you work >at Circle K?". Fortunately, there are no Circle K's here in Massachusetts, so this is one embarrassment spared us. >As a couple of people have noted, we may find it easy to ignore >censorship when it involves groups like 2Live Crew but somewhere >down that road the censors will be adding _The Infant Kiss_, _Feel It_ >and a host of other great works of art to their bon fires if we let >them get started. And what about _The_Sensual_World_? slipped between my breasts, indeed! His *what* took *what* in your *WHAT*??? Slip me the kerosene, JimBob, we gonna have us an arty english broad BBQ! >And speaking of Andy someone's query as to what IED stands for is met >with the usual silence. A friend of mine to whom I forward >Love-Hounds and who I'll call Cynthia (because that's her name) >suggests that it might stand for "In Excelsis Deo". If that is indeed >the meaning of "IED" I leave it the reader to decide how it's intended... I got an interesting insight into what the DXM part of IED0DXM meant a while ago. I always thought IED meant "I'm Extremely Devoted." (or "Dialectical")... >It seems that there have been a couple of people on here asking -- no, >pleading -- to be taken off the mailing list. That's all well and >good but the proper thing to do is note "because I've got access to >the newsgroup now." I suppose I should mention that all requests to be added/dropped or whatever have been cheerfully ignored for some time now and probably will continue to be. Dear |>ouglas has been swamped with work from his new job and has had no time to keep up with l-h. And now he's on vacation for a while in Cancun. +---------------------- Is there any ESCAPE from NOISE? ---------------------+ | | |\ | jsd@gaffa.mit.edu | ZIK ZAK - We make everything you need, | | \|on |/rukman | SIT. Now BEG! | and you need everything we make. | +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+