Gaffaweb >
Love & Anger >
1990-11 >
[ Date Index |
Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
From: katefans@world.std.com (Chris'n'Vickie of Kansas City)
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 90 05:21:39 -0500
Subject: Re: Sinful music
Chris here, OK, I confess. I wrote the Tipper piece and sent it through a friend's account. I made a mistake in editing his .login file and his name appeared on the post. I hope people found it amusing or at least a tiny bit thought provoking. We were watching CNN and watched a story about the latest attempt on the first amendment by the Parent's Music Resource Center. It seems that they want warning stickers to specifically mention what they and their hench(wo)men find offensive about the record in question. Here is the contents of the sticker in Pennsylvania: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WARNING: This recording may contain lyrics descriptive of or advocating one or more of the following: suicide incest bestiality sadomasochism sexual activity in a violent context murder morbid violence illegal use of drugs or alcohol PARENTAL ADVISORY ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The words "warning" and "parental" "advisory" are 5" by 1" each on a sticker the same "railroad orange" color that credit card companys use for "final demand" notices. The entire sticker is 6" by 9". I watched this and I thought, hey, they've just described a large number of Kate songs! So I grabbed my handy-dandy copy of "The Complete Kate" (no home should be without one) and went through it with a nosy, suspicious, hateful attitude, just like a PMRC staffer would. I don't know if many Kate fans have thought about Kate in terms that the PMRC would. On her first album she had themes of incest, murder, supernaturalism and lots and lots of sex. Now most of the sex in Kate's work is loving and non-violent, I don't count on the PMRC seeing it my way. I don't trust these people to understand, for instance, that the "Hounds of Love" are metaphorical. They would just see a woman lying on a bed snuggling up to two large dogs. And I'm not to clear on what sort of violence they would consider "morbid". Would "The Wedding List" count? I'm just pointing out that these self-appointed censors are not noted for their sensitivity to musical nuances. They don't know Heavy-Metal from Punk, Rap from Hip-Hop, or Kate from Kylie. _No one_ is safe. Chris Williams of Chris'n'Vickie of Kansas City, Mo. katefans@world.std.com A postscript on the traffic that this post generated. Susan L. Cecelia Harwood writes: > Tell me, oh *please* tell me this is a joke. Nate Hess replies: > If you re-read the ostensible signature on the last line of that post, > you'll find that he already did tell you. .ica.fib. I stole it from Chevy Chase. Bob Rogers writes: > Much stuff deleted... This person must have too much time on thier > hands. While this is obviously a joke it depicts a wierd sense of > humor. Is this someones relative? I may have too much time on my hands, but it only took an hour to write. I have a weird sense of humor. I am related to a lot of people. I have a good spell-checker. Meredith Tarr writes: > That list of "sinful music" HAS to be a joke. Tipper Gore wouldn't know a > computer keyboard if it jumped out and screamed obscenities at her. Meredith, I wouldn't dismiss the possibility of Tipper being computer literate out of hand. Her husband Albert Gore is one of the more technically astute Senators around. I like his stand on home satellite viewing rights. Just wish his wife had a different hobby. cs225ax@UX1.CSO.UIUC.EDU (Ken.") > This is obviously a slam on the stupid (IMHO) warning label stuff flying > around. A+ for a joke, though. The label thing really rubs me the wrong > way. Thanks. Glad someone got it. I guess my humor is too dry or warped for most folks. Oh well.