Gaffaweb > Love & Anger > 1990-02 > [ Date Index | Thread Index ]
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]


Crystalised Kate

From: Doug Alan <nessus@athena.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 90 20:30:11 EST
Subject: Crystalised Kate
Reply-To: Doug Alan <nessus@athena.mit.edu>
Sender: nessus@GAFFA.MIT.EDU

The following article is from *Hi Fi for Pleasure*, August 1983.  I
have typed it in to satisfy IED:

			   DIGITAL DREAMING

	Kate Bush's `The Dreaming' was digitally mastered.  It
       provided the sound that she wanted but next time she'll
	probably opt for analogue processing.  David Aldridge
			    asks her why.

Five years ago, when a young unknown named Kate Bush vocally
roller-coasted her way through the weird 'n' wonderful `Wuthering
Heights', few critics rated her as more than yet another addition to
the swollen ranks of pop's one-hit wonders.

Which just goes to show what we know.

It's now 1983, and the delightful doctor's daughter from Dulwich in
South London has established herself as easily Britian's most
adventurous and exciting female singer-songwriter.

But she's not been content to confine herself to establishing a star
reputation in just those two major areas of today's music.  Kate's
also displayed an increasing interest in, and sophisticated awareness
of, the potential of production techniques over the years.  To the
extent that she effevcively produced her most recent album, `The
Dreaming' (on EMI) herself -- and significantly, it proved to be her
most `produced' album to date.

The recording sessions were digitally mixed -- a pop practice that's
increasingly common these days.  Interestingly, though, shortly after
`The Dreaming' was in the can, Kate was approached by the tech team
from the pro-analogue, anti-digital Linn Products.

They'd heard of Kate's production interests, and decided the time was
ripe to demonstrate to an influential industry superstar just how
superior properly handled analogue recording could be.

And the word that filtered through to us from Linn -- who operate
their own super-analogue recording label -- was that the lovely little
lady was mighty impressed by the analogue-vs-digital dem they had laid
on for her.  So we thought we'd go straight to the horse's mouth and
find out whether that had indeed been the case.  It was -- sort of!

``I wouldn't say that I was necessarily impressed by their
demonstration,'' Kate Bush told Hi Fi for Pleasure.  ``But yes, I feel
that there's an awful lot in analogue recording.

``We had a lot of problems working with digital for `The Dreaming'
which was digitally mixed.  Editing was the main one -- it was so
time-consuming.

``Some things obviously were easier working digitally -- otherwise we
wouldn't have used it.  But the vast majority I reckon would have been
easier on tape.  Particularly as I was working with people who'd
worked with tape all their life."

``In the end we brought in a guy who was familiar with digital
equipment from classical recordings he'd worked on.  And it didn't
take very long after that.

``But the problems rather put me off digital.  We all felt a kind of
alienation from the process of creation using it.  There's something
reassuring about a tape that you can see and touch.  You've more trust
in it somehow.

``There was a feeling of uneasiness about using digital that stemmed
from the fact that we felt it wasn't as easy to use in many respects
as tape is.''

Kate is firmly convinced that there's plenty of life left in analogue
recording yet, despite the pro-digital brigade who reckon its days are
already numbered.  ``For one thing,'' she added, ``there's an awful
lot of really good analogue recording equipment around.  And many
studios I know of have sounded out digital gear, and opted to stay
with analogue.  Certainly it's the way I personally reckon I'll be
recording in the future.''

We talked more about her production of `The Dreaming'.  ``The fact
that I was handling that side of things automatically caused me a
great deal of concern because I was responsible then for the complete
finished product.

``Before we decided to work with digital, we did a comparison test
between analogue and digital, and all of us involved in the making of
the album just felt that we couldn't really detect any difference
except for a slight crystallised sound off of the digital.

``We did a lot of comparisons and we felt that, for the kind of music
that was happening, that was a nice sound quality to have.  Quite
honestly, if it hadn't been for that subtle difference we'd have stuck
with analogue.

``We'd certainly have stuck with it if we'd known the practical
problems we'd encounter using digital.  However, by the time we did
encounter them, we were too far advanced with it.

``I'm not sorry we tried digital.  But in the future I'd certainly
prefer to work with analogue.''

So, no beating about the Bush.  That's Kate's opinion about digital.
OK sonically in theory, but something of a problem-poser in practical
use.  So, on balance, it's analogue that gets her vote.

A fact which'll no doubt enliven the Linn pro-analogue camp no end.

<End of article.>