Re: Kate-echism XXIX.12.ii

[robinson@wtvc15.enet.dec.com]

In article <8912030003.AA17789@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>, IED

>      In regard to this idiotic trend among you and your ilk to criticize
> a work of art like _The_Sensual_World_ via factually vapid, musically
> ignorant and fundamentally boorish insults of both the music and those
> who are capable of appreciating it: go right ahead. You convince no one
> but yourselves. IED for one sees no hope of elucidating you and your
> fellow fickle cynics about the myriad facets of _TSW_'s perfection.
> If your ears can't perceive them, IED's words will go unheard, as well.
> So go right ahead--continue to embarrass yourselves with your absurd
> checklists of alleged "flaws" in _TSW_: you're just whistling away
> in the dark void of your own ignorance.
> 
> -- Andrew Marvick

IED it is _painfully_ obvious that you are incapable of any objective
criticism of Kate's
work. 


 Sure I'm a fanatic too - but I make sure that I don't have blinders on
- I know bad
when I see it (and I am not saying that the latest album is bad - but I
think one would
be hard pressed to justify its place anywhere near HoL or TD). 

And the video for Love and Anger - flaws/weaknesses (IMHO)

1)  Poor direction - who said that kate looks good at all when all I see
it the underside
                     of her jaw.

2)  Too derivitive of Sat in Your Lap.

3)  Dave looks like an _old_ Jabba the Hut here (once again poor camera
work/direction)

and finally - the biggie

4)  That inane 'chicken' imitation Kate does while singing - Kate the
disco-duck thing is
     _out_ even a
hormonally-imbalanced-over-made-up-pre-teen-club-MTV-slut wouldn't
     dance like that.




will              decwrl!islnds.dec.com!robinson


'I was trying so hard to be myself - I was turning into someone else'